Samurai and knights were different but

Samurais tend to use weapon range tactics, while Knights tend to charge towards their enemies. It may be due to the long lineage of the imperial family, stretching back unbroken to at least B. But in Japan, the shogun-emperor dynamic resulted in a stronger centralized authority the Sengoku Age being a notable exception.

Knights were also expected to protect the church and women who they did not think very high of. But while the emperor had even less political power than a pope, in truth he probably had more influence. But differences in the belief systems that influenced them meant differences in what constituted honour.

The Warrior Class Battle of Azukizaka, Source Samurai and knights were both bound by a code that stressed honour, loyalty and protecting the weak.

The Japanese were talented with their archery along with their swords which they moved around a lot during fights, forcing them to wear light iron and leather armor. But a samurai swore no such oath, and there was no legal contract of any kind.

The former sought to win honour for their lords in glorious battle, while the latter waged war through assassination and subterfuge. A Knight has a military rank and they took part in tournaments. The Peasants Peasants of Medieval Europe Source Peasants were the bottom rung of the social ladder in both feudal societies, but in Europe they formed a borderline slave class distinct from the free tradesmen who frequented the towns.

Which brings up another major difference. For all the similarities on the surface, deeper inspection reveals important differences in the values that governed political and economic relationships in Japan and Europe during their respective feudal periods.

If a Samurai dad was a Samurai he also has to become a Samurai. Indeed, while merchants may have enjoyed a higher status than farmers in Europe; in Japan they were perceived as having benefited from the work of others, and thus were regarded as the lowliest form of peasant.

Or it can be said that the Bushido had a religious status for them. The Japanese expected women to live as men showing honor and courage to their lord and even becoming a Samurai.

Bushido and chivalry are both prestigious codes of honor that were followed by two different types of people. Samurai wear armor made out of leather or steel laced together with silk cords while Knight armor was made of metallic links. Knights and samurai provide a valuable history lesson, in that they were two warrior orders that valued honour, but had differing views on what honour actually meant.

Key Differences Knights and Samurai were both well educated and great warriors. The Samurai fought for their lord for money while the European Knights fought for their lord for land.

Difference between Knight and Samurai

The Japanese Samurai lived by bushido, which was a code of honor that demanded bravery and faithfulness to the lord. They used to carry two swords during fight, a katana and a shorter blade. Knights had to promise to be faithful to the king and to give mercy to those who ask for it.

Chivalry valued generosity to all but especially to the needy. Samurai do Kendo and take part in tournaments. A knight defeated in battle may not beg for mercy, but could certainly hope for it, as the ransoming of prisoners back to their noble houses was customary during war.

Knights were located in European while Samurai in Japan.

Knights and Samurai: Comparing the Feudal Structures of Japan and Europe

If he did gift a vassal with land, it was to reward loyal service, not to secure it. An example of how extreme these warriors were is that they would perform seppuku; a ritual suicide which consists of them impaling their abdomen with a tanto knife to cause a slow painful death.

On the other side of the spectrum the Knights thought of women as weak creatures to be idolized and not being able to fend for themselves. Samurai looked more scary as compare to Knights. They used to cover every inch of body with metallic covering during fight.The samurai had horns or wings on their helmets and the knights often had feathers comming out of their armour.

Differences Now they lived on different sides of the world, and had never met so there is alot of differences. Jun 17,  · Both the samurai and the ninja were experts with different Japanese weapons.

The samurai was skilled in using the spear, bow and arrows, and the sword named for these warriors, the samurai sword. It was known that a samurai was used for quick and effective hand to hand combat with any weapon available.

Jun 16,  · Samurai and knights were both bound by a code that stressed honour, loyalty and protecting the weak. But differences in the belief systems that influenced them meant differences in what constituted honour.

For a knight to slay a surrendered foe was the height of dishonour, while a samurai deemed surrender itself to be killarney10mile.coms: Samurai and knights were different but the similarities were grater Essay  Samurai V.S.

Knight Samurai and Knights were different but the similarities were greater because of their rankings, training, armor, fighting technique, code of honor, and death viewpoint.

Misconceptions between Samurai’s of Japan and the Knights of Medieval Europe. Both samurai and knights were influenced by different code of honor, education, weapons, and armor. Similarity is often drawn between the samurai’s of Japan and European medieval knights, but both are not exactly identical.

The Samurai’s bushido and the European Knights chivalry were both codes of honor which consisted of fighting for their earthly lord, but when it came down to committing ritual suicide for their god only Samurais were up for the challenge; setting them aside from the Knights.

Samurai and knights were different but
Rated 0/5 based on 66 review