Judging Criteria Presentations will be assessed according to the criteria listed below. No additional electronic media e. The decision of the adjudicating panel is final.
Presentations are to be spoken in standard oratory prose i. PhD students who have defended, but have not yet convocated, are eligible to participate.
Presentations are to commence from the stage or at the podium. Please note that each criterion is equally weighted. Competitors must present in person and agree to be video-recorded and photographed. Did the presenter capture and maintain your attention? Did the talk follow a logical sequence?
Winner of the University of Toronto competition must be available to attend the provincial finals. Watch the Top U of T Entries from Engagement Did the talk inspire you to want to know more? Participants have three minutes or less to present their research to a panel of non-specialist judges, and competitions are held at local, provincial, and national levels.
Participants must commit to being available for the University-wide final on the evening of April 10 and the provincial final at York University on April Rules A single, static PowerPoint slide is permitted no slide transitions, animations, or "movement" of any description are allowedand the slide is to be presented from the beginning of the oration and remain in view for the duration of the oration.
Registration for the heats is on a first-come, first-served basis and open to doctoral students who have achieved candidacy i. Did the presenter use non-verbal communication i. Participants and guests are asked to arrive well before the competition starts, as space is limited and access to the rooms will be closed during the presentations.
Did the presenter convey enthusiasm for their work? Presentations are considered to have commenced when a presenter starts their presentation through movement or speech. Comprehension Did the talk help you to understand the scholarly research and creativity?
Was the pace of the talk effective? No additional props e. They must also allow those video-recordings and photographs to be made public.
It is open to the public and advertised within the community. Please contact Sarah Pickering at sgs. The challenge is to present complex research information in an engaging, accessible, and compelling way. Did the presenter clearly outline the nature and purpose of the scholarly research and creativity?Aug 11, · Queens University, University of Waterloo, Topic: Queens University Three Minute Thesis – Queens University Three Minute Thesis.
International student wins Three Minute Thesis Queen 39;s Chenman Yin is the winner of the Three Minute Thesis competition for University of Queensland – Wikipedia The University of Queensland Three Minute.
The University of Queensland has a registered trademark over the use of the Three Minute Thesis (3MT ®) logo and brand. To request permission to use 3MT information, resources and marketing material please complete the 3MT Materials Permission Form.
Distilling years of research into a three-minute presentation is challenging enough, but doing it in your second language is a monumental task.
That’s what Chenman Yin did as she claimed the Queen’s University title for the Three Minute Thesis on Tuesday. Three Minute Thesis (3MT®) celebrates the exciting research conducted by PhD students around the world.
Developed by The University of Queensland (UQ), the competition cultivates students’ academic, presentation, and research communication skills. Jun 25, · Winner, Xiaoqian Liu (Education), presents her research "Grade: an indicator more than achievement?" in 3 minutes during Queen's Three Minute Thesis competitionfor Masters & PhD students.
An 80, word PhD thesis would take 9 hours to present. Their time limit 3 minutes.Download