Exchange in social life

The opposition negatively reciprocates, or retaliates, for excessive demands in an attempt to even the score, but it simultaneously creates conflict, disequilibrium, and imbalance in the social structure.

SearchWorks Catalog

We cannot force others to give us their approval, regardless of how much power we have over them, because coercing them to express their admiration or praise would make these expressions worthless. The repeated association of meeting challenges and obtaining these social rewards makes meeting Exchange in social life challenge, through a process of reverse secondary reinforcement, intrinsically rewarding, motivating individuals to seek out challenging situations even when they are alone.

Regardless of the exact motive physical attraction, economic attraction, etc. We can represent this graphically, with small networks, putting a positive line between those who like each other and a negative line between those who do not. The book is an attempt to provide a foundation, a first step, in a broader theory of social organization.

Exchange and power in social life

Radical political opposition, for example, crannot be explained without taking into account the expressive significance it has for supporters, and failure to do so is a sorious shortcoming of formalistically rational models of politics.

Since his admiration does not suffice to increase the association time, the junior must endeavor to furnish supplementary rewards, for example, by doing odd jobs for his senior colleague, thereby obligating him to reciprocate by devoting more time to the association than he otherwise would.

Exchange in social life von Mises refers to this type as autistic exchange. They are the relations among elements in a structure. On an abstract theoretical level, opposition can be conceptualized in terms of the conflict between autonomy and interdependence of substructures in a macrostructure With economic exchange, we are able to exactly identify how much an exchange item is worth.

Suppose an individual to whom a neighbor has repeatedly lent some tools fails to reciprocate by doing his neighbor a favor when an opportunity arises. Social exchange may reflect any behavior oriented to socially mediated goals. Although personal considerations for instance, the desire not to antagonize a colleague modify these rational decisions, such factors also can be taken into account in more complex versions of the basic model, at least in principle.

Exchange processes utilize, as it were, the self-interests of individuals to produce a differentiated social structure within which norms tend to develop that require individuals to set aside some of their personal interests for the sake of those of the collectivity.

Also, social action can be intrinsically rewarding, but often social action depends on other considerations. Because we all know this, we are constantly looking for other signs that we have gained social approval, such as being invited over for dinner in return.

There tends to arise a wish to retaliate by striking down the existing powers. Since social benefits have no exact price, and since the utility of a given benefit cannot be clearly separated from that of other rewards derived from a social association, it seems difficult to apply the economic principles of maximizing utilities to social exchange.

An individual who supplies rewarding services to another obligates him. People who share the experience of being exploited by the unfair demands of those in position of power, and by the insufficient rewards they receive for their contributions, are likely to communicate their feelings of anger, frustration, and aggression to each other.

For example, among members of a political organization, they may exchange support to build solidarity, or, lovers may do things for each other to gain commitment in the relationship. The primary gratifications of human beings are originally contingent on, and become associated with, certain actions of others in their environment Neighbors exchange favors; children, toys; colleagues, assistance; acquaintances, courtesies; politicians, concessions; discussants, ideas; housewives, recipes.Blau uses concepts of exchange, reciprocity, imbalance, and power to examine social life and to derive the more complex processes in social structure from the simpler ones.5/5(2).

Exchange and Power in Social Life: Peter M. Blau. Introduction. The aim of the book is to understand social structure by understanding the processes that govern the associations among people.

The book is an attempt to provide a foundation, a first step, in a broader theory of social organization. Sociological Theory Department of Sociology and Anthropology UMD.

From Peter Blau, Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: Wiley,pp. * FOUR. Social Exchange. The concept of social exchange directs attention to the emergent properties in interpersonal relations and social interaction.

p.5 Two conditions must be met for behavior to lead to social exchange. It must be oriented toward ends that can only be achieved through interaction with other persons, and it must seek to adapt means to.

The structure of social associations --Social integration --Social support --Social exchange --Differentiation of power --Expectations --The dynamics of change and adjustment in groups --Legitimation and organization --Opposition --Mediating values in complex structures --The dynamics of substructures --Dialectical forces.

Exchange and Power in Social Life

Paperback. Condition: New. 2nd New edition. Language: English. Brand New Book. In his landmark study of exchange and power in social life, Peter M. Blau contributes to an understanding of social structure by analyzing the social processes that govern the relations between individuals and groups.

Exchange in social life
Rated 5/5 based on 54 review